Sigma 1790 vs Sigma 1792
Sigma yard ladder comparison: Sigma 1790 versus Sigma 1792 cruising layout from published model data.
Comparison table
| Category | Sigma 1790 | Sigma 1792 |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 538.8 m | 539.4 m |
| Beam | 172.42 m | 172.61 m |
| Production years | 2024– | 2024– |
| Overview | The Sigma 1790 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Swedish yards and built from 2024 to null, roughly ~150–800 hulls left the yard — Sigma 1790 Swedish cruiser with Nordic brokerage turnover. With 538.8 m LOA, 172.42 m beam, and about… | The Sigma 1792 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Swedish yards and built from 2024 to null, roughly ~150–800 hulls left the yard — Sigma 1792 Swedish cruiser with Baltic secondary-market liquidity. With 539.4 m LOA, 172.61 m beam, an… |
| Typical issues | Q: What standing rigging fatigue issues appear on Sigma 1790? A: Unknown rigging age is common on Sigma 1790; budget replacement if invoices are missing. Q: What chainplate leaks issues appear on Sigma 1790? A: Chainplate bedding failures often show as ceiling stains — moisture mapping before purchase. Q: What deck core moisture issues appear on Sigma 1790? A: Stanchion bases and tracks concentra… | Q: What standing rigging fatigue issues appear on Sigma 1792? A: Unknown rigging age is common on Sigma 1792; budget replacement if invoices are missing. Q: What chainplate leaks issues appear on Sigma 1792? A: Chainplate bedding failures often show as ceiling stains — moisture mapping before purchase. Q: What deck core moisture issues appear on Sigma 1792? A: Stanchion bases and tracks concentra… |