Linjett 40 vs HR 36
Last reviewed: · Vadim Nareyko
Linjett 40 vs HR 36 - Gustafsson/Rosättra aft-cockpit (2002–2012, ~49, 12,35×3,73) kontra Frers mittcockpit (1989–2003, ~602). Widełka FairHelm: odczucie w szkerach i cieńszy rynek kontra nordycka głębokość odsprzedaży. Miękkie pokłady, śruby kila i wiek olinowania ważą więcej niż LOA - slip obu przed handpenning.
Ownership study
You are already steering a Linjett 40 between the islands from an open stern: short day legs, narrow approaches, hands on the wheel. The seller nods and at once pulls out a Hallberg-Rassy 36 of "the same metre class". On paper both are Swedish and about twelve metres. On the water and on the hard they are different yards, different cockpits, and a different exit depth after the deal.
The Linjett 40 is an aft-cockpit Mats Gustafsson design from Rosättra Båtvarv, years 2002-2012, about 49 hulls in the reference rows. Length about 12.35 m, beam about 3.73 m. If the listing years sit far outside 2002-2012, demand proof of the launch year and of any rebuild history: otherwise you are reading another table, not this series.
The HR 36 is a centre-cockpit Germán Frers design, 1989-2003, about 602 hulls on the yard's previous-models page. Beam about 3.55 m, lightship about 7.5 t. Rosättra ran one continuous series 2002-2012 at about 49 hulls; under the HR 36 label on the secondary market live two sterns and two different aft-cabin lives (Mk I and Mk II), and you must not glue them into one length line until the builder's plate and a transom photo are checked against each other.
Among the skerries the Linjett keeps you at the open stern on short day legs and tight approaches; the HR centre cockpit tucks the crew behind the coachroof and more often finds a buyer where the badge needs no explanation. With a pool of about 49 hulls, leaving a Linjett 40 often stretches past one Baltic season.
Before a deposit, haul the Linjett onto the hard with keel fasteners (keelbolts) and standing-rigging invoices (the wires that hold the mast) in mind, inside the 2002-2012 window on the plate. Then on both boats: soft deck zones, teak by fingertip, water at the standing-rigging deck entries. On the HR separately, read the chainplates (the metal fittings that join the standing rigging to the hull) and match the stern to the hull number so Mk I is not sold as Mk II. Archipelago helm and exit market test each other earlier than an argument about "the same twelve metres".
The annual budget hits resale timing harder than entry price here. Concrete ownership cost on this pair often sounds like: how many seasons you will wait for a buyer at about 49 Linjett hulls against about 602 for the HR. The SEK figures in the table below show a cost class, not a yard offer.
This text does not fix a deal price and does not call a survey "clean". What is hidden in laminate, keelbolts, and systems shows only after a haul-out. Sea trials and an independent surveyor are still yours to order.
When to pick which
Linjett 40
Buyers choose the Linjett 40 when an open stern at archipelago pace matters more, and they accept a market of about 49 hulls. Before money, confirm years 2002-2012 on the plate or with the broker, gather teak and rigging invoices, and budget a keel-fastener inspection on the hard.
HR 36
Buyers take the HR 36 when northern recognition, familiar parts, and a protected cockpit amidships matter more. Before deposit, match the hull number to a stern photo: Mk I and Mk II split on the transom and the aft cabin; on the hard, read teak and standing-rigging attachment points with your fingers, and take wire age only from invoices.
Baltic ownership cost bands
| Cost theme | Linjett 40 band (SEK) | HR 36 band (SEK) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berth + insurance | 36 000–82 000 | 30 000–70 000 | ~12.3 vs ~11–11.9 m class |
| Winter ashore after haul-out | 14 000–34 000 | 12 000–28 000 | crane and draft |
| Teak / deck reserve | 18 000–55 000 | 15 000–45 000 | soft zones / fasteners |
| Rigging reserve | 12 000–32 000 | 10 000–30 000 | wire or rod on invoices |
| Systems / engine | 12 000–42 000 | 8 000–28 000 | package age |
| Planning total | ~100 000–260 000 | ~80 000–200 000 | excluding major teak / keel campaigns |
Routine ownership bands for the Linjett 40 / HR 36 pair in the Baltic are assembled from class practice and model guideposts: there is still no separate Dual-write export for Linjett 40 in the tree, so this is not your marina's price list. The table does not cover unscheduled teak, keelbolts on a given Linjett, or an Mk dispute: those are campaigns outside the annual plan.
Tabela porównania
| Category | Linjett 40 | HR 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Długość całkowita (LOA) | 12.35 m | 10.87 m |
| Szerokość | 3.73 m | 3.55 m |
| Lata produkcji | 2002–2012 | 1989–2003 |
| Przegląd | Linjett 40 to jeden z najbardziej szanowanych premium 40-stopowców Skandynawii. Projekt Mats Gustafsson dla Linjett Yachts; produkcja 2002–2011 w Rosättra na wschodnim wybrzeżu Szwecji, około 49 kadłubów — niskoseryjny krążownik vs Arcona 40, Hallberg-Rassy 41 i Najad 440. | HR 36 to jeden z najbardziej rozpoznawalnych jachtów seryjnych w Europie Północnej. Projekt Olle Enderlein; produkcja 1989–1988, około 1 400 kadłubów — punkt odniesienia blue-water dla skandynawskich par. Długość 10,87 m, szerokość 3,55 m, wyporność ok. |
| Typowe problemy | P: Jakie luki w inspekcji olinowania węglowego są krytyczne? O: Maszty węglowe wymagają udokumentowanej inspekcji specjalistycznej; brak zapisów — rezerwa 15 000–40 000 SEK. P: Jakie problemy styku kil–kadłub są typowe? O: Weryfikacja styku kilu nawet bez widocznych objawów; prace konstrukcyjne 8 000–26 000 SEK przy ruchu. P: Jakie uszkodzenia steru poświęcalnego występują? O: Dzielony ster… | P: Jakie przecieki przy płytach łańcuchowych są typowe? O: Wilgoć przy płytach łańcuchowych i podstawach stępek jest częsta — sprawdź plamy i miękki laminat od wewnątrz. P: Jakie zmęczenie olinowania stojącego jest typowe? O: Nieznany wiek olinowania na kadłubach klubowych traktuj jako wymianę w najbliższym czasie; pęknięcia terminali natychmiast. P: Jaka wilgoć w rdzeniu pokładu występuje? O:… |
Poznaj oba jachty
Częste pytania
- Linjett 40 or HR 36 for Baltic ownership?
- Pick the Linjett 40 (Gustafsson/Rosättra, 2002–2012, ~49) when aft-cockpit archipelago helm feel matters more than Hallberg-Rassy listing depth. Pick the HR 36 (Frers, 1989–2003, ~602) when centre-cockpit living and easier Nordic resale win. The fork is cockpit living and market depth, not LOA alone.
- What years and designers should I verify on the plate?
- Linjett 40: Mats Gustafsson at Rosättra, 2002–2012, about 49 hulls at 12.35×3.73 m. Reject LOA 12.20, beam 3.90, or years 2010–2016. HR 36: Germán Frers, 1989–2003, about 602 hulls; confirm Mk I versus Mk II.
- Are these two the same centre-cockpit living pattern?
- No. The Linjett 40 is an aft-cockpit Rosättra performance cruiser. The HR 36 is a protected centre-cockpit Frers design. Cross-shop only if you are honest about which cockpit living pattern and resale depth you want.
- What should a survey prioritise on these two?
- Teak bedding or fasteners, keelbolts on the Linjett, chainplates on the HR, standing-rigging age, and winter-storage history usually move the price more than brochure pedigree.
- How do annual Baltic ownership costs compare?
- Plan berth, insurance, winter storage, teak or deck reserves, and rigging reserves in the bands on this page. The Linjett band often sits a little higher on berth and systems; major teak campaigns sit outside the annual band for both.