Linjett 40 vs HR 36
Last reviewed: · Vadim Nareyko
Linjett 40 vs HR 36 - Gustafsson/Rosättra 后驾驶舱（2002–2012，约49艘，12.35×3.73）对 Frers 中央驾驶舱（1989–2003，约602艘）。FairHelm 分叉：群岛舵感与更薄买家池，对北欧转售深度。软甲板、龙骨螺栓与索具年限比 LOA 更重要 - 交定金前两款都上架检验。
Ownership study
You are already steering a Linjett 40 between the islands from an open stern: short day legs, narrow approaches, hands on the wheel. The seller nods and at once pulls out a Hallberg-Rassy 36 of "the same metre class". On paper both are Swedish and about twelve metres. On the water and on the hard they are different yards, different cockpits, and a different exit depth after the deal.
The Linjett 40 is an aft-cockpit Mats Gustafsson design from Rosättra Båtvarv, years 2002-2012, about 49 hulls in the reference rows. Length about 12.35 m, beam about 3.73 m. If the listing years sit far outside 2002-2012, demand proof of the launch year and of any rebuild history: otherwise you are reading another table, not this series.
The HR 36 is a centre-cockpit Germán Frers design, 1989-2003, about 602 hulls on the yard's previous-models page. Beam about 3.55 m, lightship about 7.5 t. Rosättra ran one continuous series 2002-2012 at about 49 hulls; under the HR 36 label on the secondary market live two sterns and two different aft-cabin lives (Mk I and Mk II), and you must not glue them into one length line until the builder's plate and a transom photo are checked against each other.
Among the skerries the Linjett keeps you at the open stern on short day legs and tight approaches; the HR centre cockpit tucks the crew behind the coachroof and more often finds a buyer where the badge needs no explanation. With a pool of about 49 hulls, leaving a Linjett 40 often stretches past one Baltic season.
Before a deposit, haul the Linjett onto the hard with keel fasteners (keelbolts) and standing-rigging invoices (the wires that hold the mast) in mind, inside the 2002-2012 window on the plate. Then on both boats: soft deck zones, teak by fingertip, water at the standing-rigging deck entries. On the HR separately, read the chainplates (the metal fittings that join the standing rigging to the hull) and match the stern to the hull number so Mk I is not sold as Mk II. Archipelago helm and exit market test each other earlier than an argument about "the same twelve metres".
The annual budget hits resale timing harder than entry price here. Concrete ownership cost on this pair often sounds like: how many seasons you will wait for a buyer at about 49 Linjett hulls against about 602 for the HR. The SEK figures in the table below show a cost class, not a yard offer.
This text does not fix a deal price and does not call a survey "clean". What is hidden in laminate, keelbolts, and systems shows only after a haul-out. Sea trials and an independent surveyor are still yours to order.
When to pick which
Linjett 40
Buyers choose the Linjett 40 when an open stern at archipelago pace matters more, and they accept a market of about 49 hulls. Before money, confirm years 2002-2012 on the plate or with the broker, gather teak and rigging invoices, and budget a keel-fastener inspection on the hard.
HR 36
Buyers take the HR 36 when northern recognition, familiar parts, and a protected cockpit amidships matter more. Before deposit, match the hull number to a stern photo: Mk I and Mk II split on the transom and the aft cabin; on the hard, read teak and standing-rigging attachment points with your fingers, and take wire age only from invoices.
Baltic ownership cost bands
| Cost theme | Linjett 40 band (SEK) | HR 36 band (SEK) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berth + insurance | 36 000–82 000 | 30 000–70 000 | ~12.3 vs ~11–11.9 m class |
| Winter ashore after haul-out | 14 000–34 000 | 12 000–28 000 | crane and draft |
| Teak / deck reserve | 18 000–55 000 | 15 000–45 000 | soft zones / fasteners |
| Rigging reserve | 12 000–32 000 | 10 000–30 000 | wire or rod on invoices |
| Systems / engine | 12 000–42 000 | 8 000–28 000 | package age |
| Planning total | ~100 000–260 000 | ~80 000–200 000 | excluding major teak / keel campaigns |
Routine ownership bands for the Linjett 40 / HR 36 pair in the Baltic are assembled from class practice and model guideposts: there is still no separate Dual-write export for Linjett 40 in the tree, so this is not your marina's price list. The table does not cover unscheduled teak, keelbolts on a given Linjett, or an Mk dispute: those are campaigns outside the annual plan.
对比表
| Category | Linjett 40 | HR 36 |
|---|---|---|
| 总长 (LOA) | 12.35 m | 10.87 m |
| 船宽 | 3.73 m | 3.55 m |
| 生产年份 | 2002–2012 | 1989–2003 |
| 概览 | Linjett 40 是斯堪的纳维亚最受尊重的高端 40 英尺帆船之一。Mats Gustafsson 为 Linjett Yachts 设计；2002 年至 2011 年在瑞典东海岸 Rosättra 建造，约 49 艘船体下水——面向比较 Arcona 40、Hallberg-Rassy 41 和 Najad 440 的船东低产量瑞典巡航艇。长 12.40 米、宽 3.95 米，适合夫妇和小型船员在波罗的海、斯卡格拉克和北海航行。 Linjett… | HR 36 是北欧交易最活跃的中央驾驶舱巡航艇之一。Germán Frers 为 Hallberg-Rassy 设计；1989 年至 2003 年生产，800 多艘船体。长 10.75 米、宽 3.55 米、排水量约 8 500 公斤，适合夫妇和小型船员在波罗的海、斯卡格拉克和北海航行。 HR 36 结合受保护的中央驾驶舱、扎实 GRP 层压和在恶劣天气中可预测的操船特性。1985–1995 年中央驾驶舱甲板上的原厂柚木覆盖是典型验船主题——可与 HR 34 和 HR 43… |
| 典型问题 | 问：Linjett 40 碳纤维索具检查有哪些关键缺口？ 答：碳纤维桅杆需要按计划有据可查的专业检查；缺少记录应预留 15 000–40 000 克朗。 问：Linjett 40 龙骨–船体接缝有哪些典型问题？ 答：即使没有可见症状也应系统验证龙骨接缝；出现移动或腻子裂缝时结构跟进 8 000–26 000 克朗。 问：Linjett 40 牺牲舵有哪些损伤问题？ 答：Linjett 分离舵限制坐滩损伤，但下段需检查撞击；更换舵叶 12 000–35 000 克朗。 问：Linjett 40 甲板五金密封需要什么？ 答：绞盘岛和链板区域若无定期重新密封会集中潮湿——购买前请 Tramex 测绘。 问：Linjett 40 混合世代电气有哪些相关问题？ 答：供暖和导航改装需要保险丝安全审计；文件不全时配电板升级 20 000–65 000 克朗。 Q: 是否应该将 Linjett 40… | 问：HR 36 是否有渗透问题？ 答：有——1990 年前船体可能出现皮下起泡；湿度超过 15% 需处理；10–11 米船体典型 €4 000–9 000。 问：链板问题有多严重？ 答：链板周围甲板芯材潮湿是最常见验船发现；每个区域 €800–2 500。 问：固定支索典型寿命是多少？ 答：行业惯例 10–12 年；10.75 米桅杆全索具预算 €3 000–6 000。 问：海底阀是已知问题吗？ 答：原装 Blakes 需每年润滑；更换每个配件 €150–400。 问：柴油冷却系统状况如何？ 答：MD21/MD22 可靠但热交换器锌阳极常被忽视；叶轮每 200 小时更换。 Q: 在波罗的海拥有一艘 HR 36，现实的年度持有成本是多少？ A: 除购船价外，请预算保险、冬季存放、索具检查和 1980–90 年代船体的柚木/甲板维护。HR 36 在北欧二手市场表现强劲（见… |
深入了解两款船
常见问题
- Linjett 40 or HR 36 for Baltic ownership?
- Pick the Linjett 40 (Gustafsson/Rosättra, 2002–2012, ~49) when aft-cockpit archipelago helm feel matters more than Hallberg-Rassy listing depth. Pick the HR 36 (Frers, 1989–2003, ~602) when centre-cockpit living and easier Nordic resale win. The fork is cockpit living and market depth, not LOA alone.
- What years and designers should I verify on the plate?
- Linjett 40: Mats Gustafsson at Rosättra, 2002–2012, about 49 hulls at 12.35×3.73 m. Reject LOA 12.20, beam 3.90, or years 2010–2016. HR 36: Germán Frers, 1989–2003, about 602 hulls; confirm Mk I versus Mk II.
- Are these two the same centre-cockpit living pattern?
- No. The Linjett 40 is an aft-cockpit Rosättra performance cruiser. The HR 36 is a protected centre-cockpit Frers design. Cross-shop only if you are honest about which cockpit living pattern and resale depth you want.
- What should a survey prioritise on these two?
- Teak bedding or fasteners, keelbolts on the Linjett, chainplates on the HR, standing-rigging age, and winter-storage history usually move the price more than brochure pedigree.
- How do annual Baltic ownership costs compare?
- Plan berth, insurance, winter storage, teak or deck reserves, and rigging reserves in the bands on this page. The Linjett band often sits a little higher on berth and systems; major teak campaigns sit outside the annual band for both.