HR 36 vs HR 38
Last reviewed: - Vadim Nareyko
HR 36 vs HR 38 - Frers 中央驾驶舱（1989–2003，约602艘，Mk I/II，船宽3.55）对 Enderlein 中央驾驶舱（1977–1986，约202艘，11.57×3.48），常上波罗的海短名单。FairHelm 分叉：Frers 时代挂牌深度，对更老更大的经典 Enderlein 排水量方案。柚木、索具年限与冬季停泊比船尾数字更重要 - 出价前两款都上架检验。
Ownership study
The folder holds two Hallberg-Rassy ads with a centre-cockpit and neighbouring "36/38" on the stern. One is an HR 36: Germán Frers, Ellös, years 1989-2003, about 602 hulls, beam 3.55 m, displacement about 7.5 t, with a real Mk I step (hulls 1-256, 1989-1994, hull length about 10.87 m) to Mk II (257-602, 1994-2003, about 11.31 m, another transom and bathing platform). The other is an HR 38: Olle Enderlein, Ellös, years 1977-1986, about 202 hulls, overall length 11.57 m, beam 3.48 m, displacement about 8.5 t. The buyer is not arguing aft versus centre: both cockpits are centre. Same marque and the same cockpit family, but different eras, a real Mk step on the 36, and a different classic 38 package.
HR 36 in this pair is only the Frers 1989-2003 centre-cockpit form. German copy that credits Enderlein for this 36 does not belong here. Two HR 36 ads are not interchangeable without matching Mk I against Mk II by hull number, year, and stern: otherwise you compare someone else's transom to someone else's platform. Before a deposit, match the plate to the year window and to about 602 hulls.
HR 38 here is only the Enderlein 1977-1986 centre-cockpit form. Mixing in HR 382 (another form, other years, dimensions near 11.62×3.64 m) does not belong in this pair. Look for launch year and membership in the series of about 202 hulls on the plate and in yard papers: a listing title that says "HR 38" does not prove it.
The era and displacement gap (about 7.5 t against about 8.5 t) plus the Mk step on the 36 change living, invoices, and secondary-pool depth more than an argument about "the same Hallberg-Rassy number on the stern". The Mk II step reads in the transom, bathing platform, and aft-cabin entry, so two look-alike HR 36 hulls live differently; the HR 38 is longer and heavier, yet it is the same centre-cockpit family from another era. That is a fork of generation and package, not aft versus centre.
The haul agenda for both hulls is one: factory teak fasteners, soft zones after frost seasons, chainplates (the deck fittings that take the standing rigging), invoices for wire age, winter history, and Volvo cooling service. On the HR 36, separately confirm Mk I against Mk II. On the HR 38, separately walk away from a 382 swap.
The Baltic year budget for these boats sits in neighbouring bands for the class around 11-11.6 m. The table below is the planned SEK order for this pair from the Dual-write bands, not a deal price and not your yard's invoice.
Neither entry price nor the survey outcome is promised on this page. What sits under the teak, at the chainplates, and in the systems of that hull shows up on the hard and with an independent surveyor, not in the listing.
When to pick which
HR 36
The HR 36 (Frers, Ellös) is closer when the denser Frers-era secondary pool (about 602 hulls against about 202) and a live Mk I/II step on a hull about 10.87 or 11.31 m matter more. Before a deposit, confirm 1989-2003 and Mk by number/stern, reject an Enderlein credit for this 36, and ashore read teak, chainplates, and standing-rigging invoices.
HR 38
The HR 38 (Enderlein, Ellös) is closer when displacement about 8.5 t and classic Enderlein volume on a 11.57 m hull matter more than denser comparisons inside the HR 36 family. Before a deposit, require year and hull number in the 1977-1986 window (series about 202 hulls) and an explicit walk-away from an HR 382; on the hard look at teak fasteners, moisture at the chainplates, and dates on standing-rigging invoices.
Baltic ownership cost bands
| Cost theme | HR 36 band (SEK) | HR 38 band (SEK) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berth + insurance | 30 000–70 000 | 34 000–78 000 | class ~11–11.6 m |
| Haul-out + winter | 12 000–28 000 | 12 000–30 000 | crane and keel supports |
| Teak / deck reserve | 15 000–45 000 | 16 000–52 000 | factory fasteners |
| Rigging reserve | 10 000–30 000 | 10 000–30 000 | wire age 1970s–2000s |
| Systems / engine | 8 000–28 000 | 10 000–34 000 | Volvo cooling |
| Planning total | 80 000–200 000 | 90 000–230 000 | as in Dual-write seed; excluding major teak campaigns |
SEK in the table are taken from the Dual-write seed for pair hr36-vs-hr38. Your yard and insurer will issue their own figures, and those decide. The annual band does not cover sudden teak, chainplate work, or a new sail inventory.
对比表
| Category | HR 36 | HR 38 |
|---|---|---|
| 总长 (LOA) | 10.87 m | 11.57 m |
| 船宽 | 3.55 m | 3.48 m |
| L/B | 3.06 | 3.32 |
| LWL | 9.35 m | unknown |
| Draft | 1.7 m | unknown |
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (light) | unknown |
| Ballast | 3,400 kg | unknown |
| Wetted surface | 31.3 m², calculated | unknown |
| Hulls built | 602 | unknown |
| Designer | Germán Frers | unknown |
| 生产年份 | 1989-2003 | 1977-1986 |
| 概览 | HR 36 是北欧交易最活跃的中央驾驶舱巡航艇之一。Germán Frers 为 Hallberg-Rassy 设计；1989 年至 1997 年生产，800 多艘船体。长 10.75 米、宽 3.45 米、排水量约 8 500 公斤，适合夫妇和小型船员在波罗的海、斯卡格拉克和北海航行。 HR 36 结合受保护的中央驾驶舱、扎实 GRP 层压和在恶劣天气中可预测的操船特性。1985–1995 年中央驾驶舱甲板上的原厂柚木覆盖是典型验船主题——可与 HR 34 和 HR 43... | HR 38 是北欧最知名的量产帆船之一。Olle Enderlein 为 Hallberg-Rassy 设计；1977 年至 1982 年生产，约 250 艘船体——Frers 时代之前的经典 Enderlein blue-water 巡航艇。长 11.68 米、宽 3.6 米、排水量约 9 000 公斤。 HR 38 是 Hallberg-Rassy 故事的基石——满龙骨、高干舷和仍 виправдовують 溢价要价的内饰。11.68 米 LOA 上与 HR 382、HR 41 和 Najad 390 竞争。 1970–1980 年代... |
| 典型问题 | 问：HR 36 是否有渗透问题？ 答：有——1990 年前船体可能出现皮下起泡；湿度超过 15% 需处理；10–11 米船体典型 €4 000–9 000。 问：链板问题有多严重？ 答：链板周围甲板芯材潮湿是最常见验船发现；每个区域 €800–2 500。 问：固定支索典型寿命是多少？ 答：行业惯例 10–12 年；10.75 米桅杆全索具预算 €3 000–6 000。 问：海底阀是已知问题吗？ 答：原装 Blakes 需每年润滑；更换每个配件 €150–400。 问：柴油冷却系统状况如何？ 答：MD21/MD22 可靠但热交换器锌阳极常被忽视；叶轮每 200 小时更换。 Q: 在波罗的海拥有一艘 HR 36，现实的年度持有成本是多少？ A: 除购船价外，请预算保险、冬季存放、索具检查和 1980–90 年代船体的柚木/甲板维护。HR 36 在北欧二手市场表现强劲（见... | 问：HR 38 常见哪些渗透起泡问题？ 答：较老 HR GRP 可能出现渗透；应记录屏障漆历史。 问：常见哪些链板渗漏问题？ 答：链板背板需从内部检查层压板松软。 问：常见哪些铸铁龙骨腐蚀问题？ 答：应通过湿度读数验证铁压载封装。 问：常见哪些固定支索疲劳问题？ 答：低使用率船东船仍须按日历更换。 问：常见哪些舷窗年限问题？ 答：原装舷窗常在离岸季节前需更新。 |
深入了解两款船
常见问题
- HR 36 or HR 38 for Baltic ownership?
- Pick the HR 36 (Frers, 1989–2003, ~602, Mk I/II) when Baltic listing depth and Frers-era parts familiarity matter most. Pick the HR 38 (Enderlein, 1977–1986, ~202) when more displacement and classic long-passage volume win. Both are centre-cockpit Hallberg-Rassys - the fork is era, liquidity, and size, not cockpit layout.
- What years and designers should I verify on the plate?
- HR 36: Germán Frers, 1989–2003, about 602 hulls; confirm Mk I (1–256) versus Mk II (257–602). Reject DE copy that credits Enderlein for the HR 36. HR 38: Olle Enderlein, 1977–1986, about 202 hulls at 11.57×3.48 m. Reject mix-ups with HR 382 (1984–1992, 11.62×3.64).
- Is this an aft-cockpit versus centre-cockpit fork?
- No. Both are centre-cockpit Hallberg-Rassys. The fork is Frers-era liquidity and Mk I/II living detail versus an older larger classic Enderlein displacement package.
- What should a survey prioritise on these two?
- Factory teak fasteners, chainplate moisture, standing-rigging age, winter-storage history, and Volvo cooling service usually move the price more than the number on the stern.
- How do annual Baltic ownership costs compare?
- Plan berth, insurance, haul-out, teak reserves, and rigging reserves in the bands on this page (about 80,000–200,000 SEK for the HR 36 and 90,000–230,000 SEK for the HR 38). Major teak campaigns sit outside the annual band for both.