Hanse 315 vs HR 36
Last reviewed: - Vadim Nareyko
德国紧凑尾舱入门对瑞典中央驾驶舱所有权深度:Judel/Vrolijk Hanse 315(2006–2012,9.45×3.20)对 Germán Frers Hallberg-Rassy HR 36(1989–2003,602艘 Mk I/II)。分叉:约 9.45 m Greifswald 尾舱对约 11 m Ellös 中央。拒绝 Hanse 自 1995 年起的年份、与 2016– 混用(约 9.62×3.35)及 deck-saloon 标签;拒绝此 36 上的 Enderlein。规格来自已发布型号数据。
Ownership study
The Baltic "family thirties" filter often puts a Hanse 315 next to a Hallberg-Rassy 36. In the listings both ride as "thirty-something feet," and that is the only line where their lengths match. On the plate the argument is already different: 9.45 m of German aft cockpit against a Swedish centre cockpit in the class around 11 m. Until metres and cockpit are closed, the buyer is comparing the wrong length class, not the two forms in this pair.
In this pair the Hanse 315 is read only as Judel/Vrolijk with an aft cockpit from Greifswald, years 2006-2012, 9.45×3.20 m, about 4.3 t. Print run for this form is not confirmed by yard paper, so a hull count from a listing cannot be checked. Reject titles with 1995, the generation from 2016 near 9.62×3.35 m, and the false deck-saloon badge (as if a walk-through coachroof turned the boat into a deck saloon).
On the HR 36 side only the Frers centre cockpit from Ellös 1989-2003 works, with about 602 hulls. Size: 3.55 m beam and roughly 7.5 t. The step from Mk I (1-256, 1989-1994, hull about 10.87 m) to Mk II (257-602, 1994-2003, about 11.31 m) shows in the transom and aft platform - without hull number, year, and a stern photo the cards do not glue. If Enderlein appears in a write-up of this 36, the plate has not been read yet.
The dispute here is not "who is shorter in feet" but entry into a compact German aft at 9.45 m against a Swedish centre cockpit with recognisable secondary depth around 602. Berth and insurance feel the ~9.5 versus ~11 m class split at once; exit depth from the deal does too.
Once the boat is out of the water, three things are checked the same on both: how old the standing-rigging wire is, whether the deck dips after frost, and whether a folder of winter invoices exists. On the Hanse the main points are the keel-to-hull joint and how the stanchions sit in the deck; at the same time confirm you do not have a 1995 title, a 2016 generation, or a deck-saloon badge. On the HR the list is different: whether screws still hold the teak deck, the state of the metal fittings that join shrouds to the hull, and whether the stern matches the claimed Mk.
Season budget between these length classes is berth, policy, crane with winter storage, deck or teak reserve, wire and engine. The SEK bands below show order of magnitude only, not your marina invoice.
Listing price and what an independent survey will write are not decided on this page. The keel joint on the Hanse, remaining teak on the HR, and wire age become clear after the haul.
When to pick which
Hanse 315
Take the Hanse 315 for the compact Judel/Vrolijk aft at 9.45×3.20 m in the 2006-2012 window. Before a deposit, years and dimensions must match the plate, and titles with 1995, the 2016 generation at 9.62×3.35 m, and a deck-saloon badge leave the list. On the haul check the keel joint and stanchion bedding; from invoices take standing-rigging dates.
HR 36
Take the HR 36 when a protected Frers cockpit on 3.55 m, the 1989-2003 window, and a pool of about 602 hulls matter more. Before a deposit confirm Mk I or Mk II with hull number and a transom photo, drop Enderlein in the write-up, read teak and shroud fittings by hand, and take wire dates only from service papers.
Baltic ownership cost bands
| Cost theme | Hanse 315 band (SEK) | HR 36 band (SEK) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berth + insurance | 18 000–48 000 | 28 000–70 000 | class ~9.5 vs ~11 m |
| Haul-out + winter | 7 000–20 000 | 12 000–30 000 | crane and keel supports |
| Deck / teak reserve | 8 000–28 000 | 14 000–45 000 | stanchions vs HR teak |
| Rigging reserve | 6 000–20 000 | 9 000–26 000 | wire age |
| Systems / engine | 7 000–24 000 | 10 000–32 000 | compact vs Volvo |
| Planning total | 50 000–140 000 | 80 000–200 000 | excluding major teak or keel campaigns |
The SEK figures match the previously published table for this pair. Only your yard invoice and a signed policy will name the real sum.
对比表
| Category | Hanse 315 | HR 36 |
|---|---|---|
| 总长 (LOA) | 9.45 m | 10.87 m |
| 船宽 | 3.2 m | 3.55 m |
| L/B | 2.95 | 3.06 |
| LWL | unknown | 9.35 m |
| Draft | unknown | 1.7 m |
| Displacement | unknown | 7,500 kg (light) |
| Ballast | unknown | 3,400 kg |
| Wetted surface | unknown | 31.3 m², calculated |
| Hulls built | unknown | 602 |
| Designer | unknown | Germán Frers |
| 生产年份 | 2006-2012 | 1989-2003 |
| 概览 | Hanse 315 是北欧最知名的量产帆船之一。Judel & Vrolijk 为 Hanse Yachts 设计;2006 年至 2012 年在 Greifswald 建造,约 400–500 艘船体下水——面向从 Hanse 301 和 311 升级的夫妇的自闭合沿海巡航艇。长 9.55 米、宽 3.3 米、排水量约 4 300 公斤,适合在波罗的海、斯卡格拉克和北海少人数航行。 Hanse 315 在 Hanse 自闭合前帆公式基础上增加比 311 更大的船宽和内部空间,又不必跳到 34... | HR 36 是北欧交易最活跃的中央驾驶舱巡航艇之一。Germán Frers 为 Hallberg-Rassy 设计;1989 年至 1997 年生产,800 多艘船体。长 10.75 米、宽 3.45 米、排水量约 8 500 公斤,适合夫妇和小型船员在波罗的海、斯卡格拉克和北海航行。 HR 36 结合受保护的中央驾驶舱、扎实 GRP 层压和在恶劣天气中可预测的操船特性。1985–1995 年中央驾驶舱甲板上的原厂柚木覆盖是典型验船主题——可与 HR 34 和 HR 43... |
| 典型问题 | 问:Hanse 315 自闭合前帆有哪些磨损问题? 答:自闭合帆绳和卷帆器滚筒需要保养记录;更换费用 8 000–25 000 克朗。 问:Hanse 315 帆驱密封有哪些关键问题? 答:Yanmar 帆驱膜片需要定期保养;忽视密封会导致舱底进水和腐蚀——预算 5 000–16 000 克朗。 问:Hanse 315 链板渗漏有哪些典型问题? 答:链板密封失效常表现为天花板污渍——购买前请测绘湿度。 问:Hanse 315 固定支索疲劳有哪些相关问题? 答:即使里程较低也适用日历更换;缺少账单时预算 25 000–45 000 克朗。 问:Hanse 315 甲板五金密封需要什么? 答:极简甲板若无定期重新密封,滑轨和支柱底座仍会集中进水。 | 问:HR 36 是否有渗透问题? 答:有——1990 年前船体可能出现皮下起泡;湿度超过 15% 需处理;10–11 米船体典型 €4 000–9 000。 问:链板问题有多严重? 答:链板周围甲板芯材潮湿是最常见验船发现;每个区域 €800–2 500。 问:固定支索典型寿命是多少? 答:行业惯例 10–12 年;10.75 米桅杆全索具预算 €3 000–6 000。 问:海底阀是已知问题吗? 答:原装 Blakes 需每年润滑;更换每个配件 €150–400。 问:柴油冷却系统状况如何? 答:MD21/MD22 可靠但热交换器锌阳极常被忽视;叶轮每 200 小时更换。 Q: 在波罗的海拥有一艘 HR 36,现实的年度持有成本是多少? A: 除购船价外,请预算保险、冬季存放、索具检查和 1980–90 年代船体的柚木/甲板维护。HR 36 在北欧二手市场表现强劲(见... |
深入了解两款船
常见问题
- Hanse 315 or HR 36 for Baltic ownership?
- Pick the Hanse 315 (Judel/Vrolijk, 2006–2012, 9.45×3.20, aft cockpit) when entry price and a compact coastal program fit. Pick the HR 36 (Germán Frers, 1989–2003, 602 Mk I/II, centre cockpit) when Nordic resale depth and protected living justify the premium. Reject Hanse 1995– years and 2016– mix-up. The fork is size, price, and ownership culture, not LOA alone.
- What years and designers should I verify on the plate?
- Hanse 315 (FairHelm): Judel/Vrolijk, 2006–2012, about 9.45×3.20 m. Reject 1995– years and the later 2016– Hanse 315 near 9.62×3.35 m. HR 36: Germán Frers, 1989–2003, 602 hulls (Mk I/II) at hull about 10.87 / 11.31 m, beam 3.55 m.
- Is the 2006 Hanse 315 the same as the 2016 Hanse 315?
- No. FairHelm covers the Judel/Vrolijk 2006–2012 generation at about 9.45×3.20 m. A later 2016– Hanse 315 sits near 9.62×3.35 m. Do not mix plates, keel options, or systems lists.
- What should a survey prioritise on these two?
- On the Hanse 315 prioritise keel joint, stanchion or track bedding after freeze seasons, and standing-rigging age. On the HR 36 prioritise teak fasteners, chainplates, and standing-rigging age. Winter-storage history moves price on both.
- How do annual Baltic ownership costs compare?
- Plan berth, insurance, haul-out, deck or teak reserves, and rigging reserves in the bands on this page (about 50,000–140,000 SEK for the Hanse 315 and 80,000–200,000 SEK for the HR 36). Major teak or keel campaigns sit outside the annual band for both.