HR 36 vs HR 29
Side-by-side specs generated from published model data. For curated analysis, see our pre-built comparisons or book advisory.
Classic HR size jump — book advisory to compare deck core moisture and standing rigging age before you pay for the extra volume. Buyer advisory
Comparison table
| Category | HR 36 | HR 29 |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 10.87 m | 8.9 m |
| Beam | 3.55 m | 2.83 m |
| Production years | 1989–2003 | 1982–1994 |
| Overview | The HR 36 is one of Northern Europe's most traded centre-cockpit cruisers. Designed by Germán Frers for Hallberg-Rassy and built from 1989 to 2003 — a blue-water benchmark for Scandinavian couples stepping up from smaller HR and Najad hulls. | The HR 29 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Developed by Hallberg-Rassy as a compact pocket cruiser and built from 1982 to 1994 — one of the most financially accessible entries into the HR brand. |
| Typical issues | Q: Does the HR 36 suffer from osmosis? A: Yes — pre-1990 hulls built with non-osmosis-resistant polyester resin develop subsurface blistering in the boot stripe. Survey moisture readings above 15% (Tramex) on dry hulls warrant full treatment; typical cost at Nordic yards in 2024–2025 was €4,000–9,000 for hulls 10–11 m. | Q: What keel-hull joint issues appear on HR 29? A: Cyclic loading after 30+ years can stress the joint; internal staining or recurring fairing cracks warrant specialist survey. Q: What aged fuel-system issues appear on HR 29? A: Original tanks, hoses, and shutoffs often need staged replacement — budget modernization before offshore plans. |