HR 412 vs HR 38
Hallberg-Rassy size step on the used market: HR 412's offshore layout against HR 38's centre-cockpit Baltic resale pool. Side-by-side specs from published model data.
HR 412 vs HR 38 — advisory helps weigh survey findings against resale depth. Buyer advisory
Comparison table
| Category | HR 412 | HR 38 |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.61 m | 11.57 m |
| Beam | 4.11 m | 3.48 m |
| Production years | 2012–2021 | 1977–1986 |
| Overview | The HR 412 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable modern production sailboats. | The HR 38 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Olle Enderlein for Hallberg-Rassy and built from 1977 to 1982 — a classic Enderlein blue-water cruiser before the Frers era scaled the range. |
| Typical issues | Q: Does HR 412 rod rigging need special survey attention? A: Yes — inspect rod head torque records and terminal cracks; missing documentation on 2013–2018 hulls often triggers €5,000–9,000 rigging quotes. Q: How quickly do electronics become outdated on HR 412? A: NMEA integration, radar mounting loads, and display obsolescence are common; budget €3,000–12,000 for sensible refit tiers. | Q: What osmotic blistering issues appear on HR 38? A: Older HR GRP may show osmosis; barrier-coat history should be documented. Q: What chainplate leak issues appear on HR 38? A: Chainplate backing pads need internal inspection for laminate softness. Q: What iron keel corrosion issues appear on HR 38? A: Iron ballast encapsulation should be verified with moisture readings. |