Maxi 84 vs HR 38

Swedish volume production versus centre-cockpit pedigree: Maxi 84's Baltic following against Hallberg-Rassy HR 38's resale pool. Side-by-side specs from published model data.

Maxi 84 vs HR 38 — advisory clarifies which refit budget matches your plans. Buyer advisory

Comparison table

CategoryMaxi 84HR 38
Length overall8.5 m11.57 m
Beam2.95 m3.48 m
L/B2.883.32
LWL7.2 munknown
Draft1.5 munknown
Displacement3,000 kg (light)unknown
Ballast1,350 kgunknown
Hulls built1154-1350unknown
Engine1977-1983 - Volvo Penta MD7 - 13 hp - standardunknown
Hull materialgrpunknown
Keelfinunknown
Rigmastheadunknown
DesignerPelle Pettersonunknown
Cockpitaftunknown
Production years1977-19831977-1986
OverviewYou put a tape on the Maxi 84 at midships, and on the phone the card still shows a 2.54 m beam and designer Arvid Laurin.The HR 38 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Olle Enderlein for Hallberg-Rassy and built from 1977 to 1982 — a classic Enderlein blue-water cruiser before the Frers era scaled the range.
Typical issuesWhat that means on survey, not in brand romance. Like neighbouring Maxis, the topsides rise to the deck: volume below, a tight foredeck, awkward boarding forward - SEILmagasinet says so outright. The mast stands on deck and bears on a post below; on some hulls that post **sags** (do not treat “tabernacle” as the only layout).Q: What osmotic blistering issues appear on HR 38? A: Older HR GRP may show osmosis; barrier-coat history should be documented. Q: What chainplate leak issues appear on HR 38? A: Chainplate backing pads need internal inspection for laminate softness. Q: What iron keel corrosion issues appear on HR 38? A: Iron ballast encapsulation should be verified with moisture readings.