Moody 34 vs HR 38
British quality cruiser versus Swedish centre-cockpit pedigree: Moody 34's build against Hallberg-Rassy HR 38's Baltic resale pool. Side-by-side specs from published model data.
Moody 34 vs HR 38 — advisory helps weigh survey findings against resale depth. Buyer advisory
Comparison table
| Category | Moody 34 | HR 38 |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 10.19 m | 11.57 m |
| Beam | 3.56 m | 3.48 m |
| Production years | 1983–1986 | 1977–1986 |
| Overview | The Moody 34 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Angus Dickinson for Moody and built from 1983 to 1989 — a British centre-cockpit cruiser with strong Moody Owners Association support. | The HR 38 is one of Northern Europe's most recognisable production sailboats. Designed by Olle Enderlein for Hallberg-Rassy and built from 1977 to 1982 — a classic Enderlein blue-water cruiser before the Frers era scaled the range. |
| Typical issues | Q: What bilge keel maintenance issues appear on Moody 34? A: Twin bilge keels need fairing inspection after grounding; budget 15,000–40,000 kr if delamination appears. Q: What chainplate leak issues appear on Moody 34? A: Deck-hung chainplates on 1980s Moodys often show internal staining; moisture mapping before purchase. | Q: What osmotic blistering issues appear on HR 38? A: Older HR GRP may show osmosis; barrier-coat history should be documented. Q: What chainplate leak issues appear on HR 38? A: Chainplate backing pads need internal inspection for laminate softness. Q: What iron keel corrosion issues appear on HR 38? A: Iron ballast encapsulation should be verified with moisture readings. |